Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/fonts/TeX/fontdata.js

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Earth's atmosphere: how good is our model from class?

In class, we worked out how the density would scale with radius in the Earth's atmosphere using 2 assumptions: 1) taking the gravitational acceleration to be constant and equal to g=GMR2 and 2) taking the atmosphere to be isothermal (all at the same temperature T). Here, I'll discuss what happens when you relax those assumptions, one at a time, and then go on to discuss a more realistic model of Earth's atmosphere. Let's first relax assumption 1) but keep assumption 2). Set up force balance on a parcel of mass with mass m, area A, and thickness Δr at a radius r above the center of the Earth: Fg+A(P(r+Δr)+P(r))=0. Now before we had used Fg=mg for the force of gravity, but now let's account for the fact that the mass is at some radius r>R. In other words, mg is the gravitational force at the Earth's surface; but we want the force at some distance h=rR above the surface. We have Fg=GMmr2. We can then write GMmr2=A(P(r+Δr)P(r)). Now note that for a parcel with density ρ(r), the mass is m=AΔrρ(r). Note that we have let the parcel's density be a function of r here because the density is changing as you go up in the atmosphere. We don't yet know what function of r ρ is, but we'll find out! Rewriting our previous result by replacing the mass and then dividing both sides by area A and Δr, we get GMρ(r)r2=dPdr. Note that, just as we did in class, I've rewritten (P(r+Δr)P(r))/Δr as dP/dr. We now use the ideal gas law, which is a good approximation for our atmosphere, provided we use the right average particle mass from the atmosphere's measured composition, to replace P(r)=ρ(r)kBT/ˉm, where we remember assumption 2) is still in force so T is not a function of r. ˉm is the average mass per particle, which we used to write the number density in the ideal gas law as a mass density over a mass. We now have the differential equation GMρ(r)r2=dρdrkBTˉm. We can rearrange this to read GMˉmkBTr2dr=dρρ. We can now integrate both sides of this equation to find ρ(r), but before we do so, let's look at the physical meaning. The left-hand side (lhs) compares the gravitational energy due to a fractional increas in radius Δr/r), with the thermal energy, kBT. To make that clearer, remember, gravitational PE is PE=GMmr, so we can rewrite GMmr2dr=GMrdrr=PE×drr. So this is saying, if we go up by a fractional radius \dr/r, then the potential energy will change by PE times that fraction. How much the PE changes relative to the thermal energy determines the fractional change in density, dρ/ρ; that's what the right-hand side is telling us. Now let's solve: rRGMˉmkBTr2dr=rRdρρ. We find GMˉmkBT1r|rR=lnρ|rR, which can be rearranged and simplifed to give ρ(r)=ρ(R)exp[GMˉmkBT[1r1R]]. To make sense of this, let's write r in terms of R and height h above the Earth's surface, as r=R+h=R(1+hR). We can then Taylor expand r1 about h=0, meaning h/R1. Doing so we have r11R(1hR+(hR)2+). Let's see what this does in our expression for ρ, specifically in the term [1r1R]. We can see the 1 in the expansion will be canceled out by the 1R above, and at lowest order in h we recover the result from class for constant gravitational force, ρeh. We have ρ(h)=exp[PEEth[hR+(hR)2]]. Note that I've rewritten this in terms of the ratio of potential energy to thermal energy, for the physical reasons discussed earlier (before we integrated). You can see that accounting for the variation of the force of gravity with r slightly increases the density, because the term in (h/R2) is positive. Note that it's also small, because typical heights would be much less than the Earth's radius. Using that idea, we can even Taylor expand the whole exponential, this time by factoring out hR to have exp[PEEthhR[1hR]]=exp[PEEthhR]×exp[PEEthhRhR]. Approximating the second exponential, we have . . .

No comments:

Post a Comment